Using Funny Persuasive Essay Topics to Attract Attention

Using Funny Persuasive Essay Topics to Attract AttentionFunny persuasive essay topics are so popular in college. They appeal to many and enable students to find interesting ways to inject humor into their essays. This is true not only in writing contests and tests, but also in real life.At a party, you might meet a difficult person. How will you approach the situation? How can you make the topic of conversation funny? If you know of a joke, can you come up with a humorous analogy for that joke?There are several types of persuasive essay topics. Some are funny, some are political, some are historical, some are scientific, and others are simply entertaining. In addition, you need to have a few topics that are clever, and those that can provoke thought and invite ideas.So, what are the best persuasive essay topics? Well, they are quite easy to find. Most of these topics are jokes. Others are compelling but less serious topics.A few examples of good persuasive essay topics are about a fa mous quote, an embarrassing moment in your life, or your favorite football team. While most of the topics are jokes, some will touch on a more serious subject. As an example, if you write a persuasive essay about the power of humor, you should try to include some depth to the topic.When writing persuasive essay topics, it is important to keep in mind what you want to achieve with the essay. Many people use humor in their essays to provoke thought. They might need to change the topic of the essay to one that is even more interesting, or one that has a different perspective. Humor will help you do that.Whatever type of persuasive essay topics you choose, you will be sure to attract attention. With that in mind, go ahead and write as many persuasive essays as you like. You may even find yourself a winner in the contests and tests. If you think this idea is interesting, you can find some samples of great persuasive essay topics over at College Humor.

Max Weber s Theories About Status And Social Stratification

Baseball in the 19th century was both an extracurricular activity and a cathartic activity for American society that suffered from the demands of industrialism. In order to better understand the sociological perspective of baseball in relation to the social context of its’ origination, this paper will consider baseball in the context of Max Weber’s theories about status and social stratification. Although his theories are seemingly similar to Karl Marx, their theories are essentially different. Marx primarily believes that economics and class are distinguishing factors of society; whereas, Weber believes that status and social stratification are the distinguishing factors of society. When applying a sociological perspective of Max Weber†¦show more content†¦An empirical example of the prestige associated with baseball in the 19th century was the elusive Knickerbocker Club, an example of a new social stratification, fraternities. â€Å"Among the clubs, highly r itualized relationships helped preserve the integrity of the early fraternity.† (Rader 14). These rituals were extensions of the highly ritualized rules of the game of baseball. And in a tertiary fashion, thus mimicked the highly organized bureaucratic rationalization of society. The Knickerbocker Club also went against societal norms by hosting raucous parties with lewd and baseless activities. These activities were aberrant in day-to-day existence, yet the Knickerbockers were able to get away with this kind of behavior. Additionally, one aspired to be a Knickerbocker, or at least like them. Possibly, the start of these lewd clubs was the catalyst for the changes in modesty during the 1920’s. Baseball, for Weber, gives the 19th century working class an opportunity to assimilate outside of their working affiliations, or Marxian-like class associations. Weber would have analyzed baseball by simultaneously reaffirming community interactions and involvement, which provided opportunity for exclusion and inclusion. Weber asserts that conflict is the most important element in society. The conflict

The Perils Of Obedience By Stanley Milgram - 757 Words

Obedience above all In his article The Perils of Obedience†, Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment to determine if the innate desire to obey an authority figure overrides the morality and consciousness that had been already established in a person. After Milgram conducted his experiments he concluded that 60% of the subjects complied to an authority figure rather than their own sympathy. There was additional testing outside the US which showed an even higher compliance rate. Milgram reasoned that the subjects enjoyed the gratification from the experimenter, who was the authority figure in the experiment. He noted that most of the subjects are proud to carry out the demands of the experimenter. Milgram believed for that reason, why the†¦show more content†¦The experimenter in the study is the authority figure, constantly pressuring the teacher to carry out the experiment. When the voltages increased, the learner will cite about their heart issues in order to invoke a sympathetic response in the teacher meanwhile the experimenter is pushing the teacher to continue the experiment. Most teachers, at this point, would often get into an argument with the experimenter and would contemplate with their own morality whether or not to continue the experiment. The experiment is stopped when the teacher refuses to continue or the teacher has reached the maximum amount of voltage possible. Milgrim first tested his experiments on Yale students. Milgrams hypothesis stated that most of the teachers would not go beyond 150 volts (only 4%), as their consciousness would intervene. The results of Milgrams first experiment was far from his prediction. When Milgram performs his first test on Yale students, many argued that the students were too competitive and aggressive the results wouldnt be accurate for the majority. Milgrim further expanded his subject pool to middle-class adults, white collar, and industrial workers. He found that all of the groups held identical results with the Yale students, with 60% of the subjects complying all the way to 450 volts. As a result, Milgrams experiment led to numerous theories on why the subjects were overriding their moral sense. One theory suggests that all people obtain a repressed innateShow MoreRelatedThe Perils Of Obedience By Stanley Milgram950 Words   |  4 PagesIn The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram introduces us to his experimental studies on the conflict between one’s own conscience and obedience to authority. From these experiments, Milgram discovered that a lot of people will obey a figure in authority; irrespective of the task given - even if it goes against their own moral belief and values. Milgram’s decision to conduct these experiments was to investigate the role of Adolf Eichmann (who played a major part in the Holocaust) and ascertain ifRead MoreThe Perils Of Obedience By Stanley Milgram1506 Words   |  7 Pagestotally catch the layman s creative energy as the submission tests led by Stanley Milgram. As one of only a handful couple of mental analyses to ha ve such a consideration getting criticalness, Milgram found a concealed quality of the human mind that appeared to demonstrate a shrouded insane in even the most coy individual. Milgram presents his startling discoveries in The Perils of Obedience. By first investigating what Milgram is endeavoring to find in his examination of acquiescenceis that it isRead MoreThe Perils of Obedience, by Stanley Milgram1499 Words   |  6 Pageswould you follow your direct orders? That is the question that Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University tested in the 1960’s. Most people would answer â€Å"no,† to imposing pain on innocent human beings but Milgram wanted to go further with his study. Writing and Reading across the Curriculum holds a shortened edition of Stanley Milgram’s â€Å"The Perils of Obedience,† where he displays an eye-opening experiment that tests the true obedience of people under authority figures. He observes that most peopleRead MoreThe P erils Of Obedience By Stanley Milgram918 Words   |  4 Pages Stanley Milgram, an American social psychologist, aggrandized many minds as he delved into a very common habit that humans exhibit every day. One could infer that it was his curiosity which prompted him to write on this topic provided that he was born into a Jewish family. This topic is the human behavior of obedience. â€Å"The Perils of Obedience† was written by Stanley Milgram in 1974. This essay is based upon the findings of his experiment he conducted at Yale University in 1961. The objectiveRead MoreStanley Milgram The Perils Of Obedience Summary833 Words   |  4 PagesIn his article â€Å"The Perils of Obedience†, Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment to determine if the innate desire to obey an authority figure overrides the morality and consciousness that had been already established in an individual. After Milgram conducted his experiments he concluded that 60% of the subjects complied to an authority figure rather than their own morals. There was additional testing outside the US which showed an even higher compliance rate. Milgram reasoned that the subjectsRead More The Perils of Obedience by Stanley Milgram Essay812 Words   |  4 Pages â€Å"The Perils of Obedience† was written by Stanley Milgram in 1974. In the essay he describes his experiments on obedience to authority. I feel as though this is a great psychology essay and will be used in psychology 101 classes for generations to come. The essay describes how people are willing to do almost anything that they are told no matter how immoral the action is or how much pain it may cause.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  This essay even though it was written in 1974 is still used today because of its historicalRead MoreAnalysis Of The Perils Of Obedience By Stanley Milgram1489 Words   |  6 Pagesabuse inflicted on them by the prison guards (Zimbardo 116). In â€Å"The Perils of Obedience† Stanley Milgram writes about a controversial experiment in which he requests volunteers to assist him in shocking participants who answer incorrectly to certain questions on the opposite side of a wall. The shock that the volunteers believe they are administering could cause great harm or even be deadly to the participants. After Milgram conducts the experiment, he concludes that normal people are capable ofRead MoreA Critique Of Stanley Milgram s The Perils Of Obedience 1064 Words   |  5 PagesKarsten Piper Due Date: 6/27/15 A Critique of Stanley Milgram’s: â€Å"The Perils of Obedience† Stanley Milgram’s article, â€Å"The Perils of Obedience,† first appeared in the December 1973 issue of Harper’s Magazine. In the article, Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, presented the thesis that â€Å"Obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency , indeed a potent impulse overriding training in ethics, sympathy and moral conduct .† To prove his point, Milgram conducted a series of experiments at YaleRead MoreAnalysis Of Stanley Milgram s Perils Of Obedience Essay1709 Words   |  7 PagesStill, many questions still remain prevalent as to how an individual reaches his or her decision on obedience in a distressing environment. Inspired by Nazi trials, Stanley Milgram, an American psychologist, questions the social norm in â€Å"Perils of Obedience† (1964), where he conducted a study to test how far the average American was willing to for under the pressures of an authority figure. Milgram s study showed that under the orders of an authoritative figure, 64% of average Americans had the capabilityRead MoreAnalysis Of Stanley Milgram s The Perils Of Obedience 2023 Words   |  9 Pages Essay #4 – Obedience and Defiance Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted an experiment, which later wrote about it in â€Å"The Perils of Obedience† in 1963 to research how people obey authoritative figures and what extent a person would go inflicting pain onto an innocent person. The study involved a teacher (subject), learner (actor), and an experimenter (authoritative figure). The teacher was placed in front of a control panel labeled with electrical shocks ranging from

Does The Government Control Our Rights Essay Example For Students

Does The Government Control Our Rights? Essay How many rights do you have? You should check, because it might not be as many as you think. Some people are not concerned that the police can execute a search warrant without knocking, set up roadblocks, and interrogate innocent citizens. Nor are they concerned when a drug dealer receives a life sentence for selling a quarter gram of cocaine for $20 (Bailey). When you combine current events with the widespread need of people to fit into society, we should all be concerned. The Bill of Rights, when written, established and protected our personal freedoms from government interference. For centuries, governments have tried to regulate information thought to be inappropriate or offensive. Todays technology has given the government an excuse to interfere with free speech. By claiming that radio frequencies are a limited resource, the government tells broadcasters what to say and what not to say. The FCC (Federal Communications Commission) carefully monitors news, public, and local progra mming for what they consider obscenity (Hyland). As in speech, technology has provided another excuse for government intrusion in the press. The Secret Service can confiscate computers, printers, hard disks, and mail from electronic services they do not consider a press. Entire stores of books and videotapes are seized because of sexually explicit material. The Bill of Rights and the First Amendment exists to protect speech and press that is unpopular. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression (Steele). If unpopular ideas did not exist, we would not need the First Amendment. The right to bear arms is so commonly challenged that it has its own name: gun control. Banning weapons not for legitimate sporting purposes is a misuse of the right to bear arms amendment. If the need for defense arises, it will not be herds of deer that threaten our security, but humans (Steele). It is an unfortunate fact that the guns we need for defense are guns that attack people not anima ls. The right to be secure in your home goes hand in hand with the right to bear arms. A law that went into effect in 1991 allows the tax assessor to enter your home and list your personal property for tax purposes. Being required to tell the state everything you own and submitting to an invasion by the taxman is not being secure in your home. Maybe that is why the government controls guns. Out of the ten amendments in the Bill of Rights, only one is not threatened. No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war (United States). This amendment is fairly safe because of the amount of tax money the government spends to maintain the armed forces. With this much of the Bill of Rights in question, how can we be sure our rights are safe? Differences in character, appearance, and emotion make us all individuals. Watching and hearing other people form the foundation for our personal beliefs. What we learn from childhood to expect, as an inalienable right, may not be. When the government can take away your choice to smoke, tell you when to wear a seatbelt, or decide what constitutes a religion we should all be concerned! To preserve the Bill of Rights for ourselves, we must defend them for everybody. Works CitedBailey, Thomas A., David M. Kennedy, and Lizabeth Cohen. The American Pageant. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1998. Hyland, Paul, Sammells, Neil. Writing and Censorship. London: Routledge; 1992: 1-13; 133-167. Steele, Shari. Taking a Bite Out of the First Amendment. http://www.eff.org/pub/Cenorship/human_rights_961420.article. 1996. .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41 , .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41 .postImageUrl , .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41 , .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41:hover , .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41:visited , .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41:active { border:0!important; } .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41:active , .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41 .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf990d4954e899fc06994dbb8f03dcf41:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Women in the Civil Rights Movement EssayUnited States. Annotated Constitution. GPO Gate 20 June 1998http://www.gpo.ucop.edu/cgibin/gpogate?waisdoc=14=waisback.access.gpo.gov;constitution_1996_supplement/TEXT/10982/3=6%2010982%20/disk3/wais/data/constitution_1996_supplement/s96art2.wais; (20 June 1998). Social Issues